Using a web - based decision support intervention to facilitate patient - physician communication at prostate cancer treatment discussions
نویسنده
چکیده
Purpose: To measure the preferences and values of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC) using a web-based decision support technology—the Decision Support Intervention-Prostate Cancer (DSI-PC). Methods: Health information seeking behaviour, factors having an influence on the treatment decision, decision control, and preferred treatment were recorded by the DSI-PC program prior to the treatment consultation. A summary page of responses was provided to each patient to use at treatment discussions. Measures of decision control and decision conflict were measured prior to the treatment discussion, and following a treatment decision. Patient satisfaction was measured after a treatment decision had been made. Results: Forty-nine men completed the DSI-PC program prior to their treatment discussion. Sixty-one per cent shared the summary sheet with their physician/s when discussing treatment options. The majority (63%) of patients wanted access to in-depth or detailed information. Impact of treatment on survival, urinary function, bowel function, and physician’s treatment recommendation were the four factors having the most influence on patients’ treatment decisions. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with their treatment decision, and involvement in treatment decision making (TDM). Levels of decision conflict were significantly lower (p < 0.001) after a treatment decision was made, and men reported assuming a significantly more active role in TDM than originally preferred (p = 0.038). Conclusions: Results suggest that the DSI-PC intervention may be a useful tool to help patients identify and communicate their values and preferences to physicians at the time of treatment discussions.
منابع مشابه
Patient perceptions of how physicians communicate during prostate cancer screening discussions: a comparison of residents and faculty.
BACKGROUND Residents are required to demonstrate competency in communication skills. Prostate cancer screening discussions are examples of complex physician-patient communication processes, requiring an objective presentation of the known risks, potential benefits, and scientific uncertainties surrounding screening. National organizations recommend shared decision making (SDM) in these discussi...
متن کاملImpact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND At an early stage, prostate cancer patients are often eligible for more than one treatment option, or may choose to defer curative treatment. Without a pre-existing superior option, a patient has to weigh his personal preferences against the risks and benefits of each alternative to select the most appropriate treatment. Given this context, in prostate cancer treatment decision-makin...
متن کاملDevelopment and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience.
OBJECTIVE Cancer patients and survivors are assuming active roles in decision-making and digital patient support tools are widely used to facilitate patient engagement. As part of Cancer Information Service Research Consortium's randomized controlled trials focused on the efficacy of eHealth interventions to promote informed treatment decision-making for newly diagnosed prostate and breast canc...
متن کاملAssessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility and patient impact of using standardized video presentations concerning alternative treatments for managing localized prostate cancer. METHODS One hundred eleven men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were shown a video tape concerning the risks and benefits of four treatment options: radical surgery, external beam radiation, hormonal therapy, ...
متن کاملPatient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review
OBJECTIVE Active surveillance (AS) represents a fundamental shift in managing select cancer patients that initiates treatment only upon disease progression to avoid overtreatment. Given uncertain outcomes, patient engagement could support decision-making about AS. Little is known about how to optimize patient engagement for AS decision-making. This scoping review aimed to characterize research ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014